<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jack Adams Is Not A Crutch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yankeecanuck.com/2008/05/the-jack-adams-is-not-a-crutch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yankeecanuck.com/2008/05/the-jack-adams-is-not-a-crutch/</link>
	<description>0-38 ain't nothing but a thang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:40:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeecanuck.com/2008/05/the-jack-adams-is-not-a-crutch/comment-page-1/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeecanuck.com/?p=372#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>GZ Expat - I could take boring hockey (again) if it brought results. But that window has passed. 29 teams know how to shut down Vancouver (re: Vigneault&#039;s) system now. He has to learn to evolve his strategy or it&#039;ll be boring hockey on top of losing hockey.

Nebcanuck - I think it&#039;s safe to assume that Gillis will bring in offensive talent (how &quot;talented&quot; they will be is of course up to debate). But the alarming thing to me is that he has NEVER coached an offensively-talented team. In Montreal he had the likes of Recchi, Damphousse, Rucinsky, Koivu, Corson, Zubrus, Linden (snicker), Savage, etc at his disposal and couldn&#039;t use them effectively. He&#039;s had even less to work with in Vancouver honestly; assuming Gillis solves that, we&#039;ll still back at square one wondering how long it&#039;ll take him to employ his old tactics. Maybe he&#039;ll adapt, maybe he won&#039;t. If this team goes 5-20 out of the gate, sadly it wouldn&#039;t be shocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GZ Expat &#8211; I could take boring hockey (again) if it brought results. But that window has passed. 29 teams know how to shut down Vancouver (re: Vigneault&#8217;s) system now. He has to learn to evolve his strategy or it&#8217;ll be boring hockey on top of losing hockey.</p>
<p>Nebcanuck &#8211; I think it&#8217;s safe to assume that Gillis will bring in offensive talent (how &#8220;talented&#8221; they will be is of course up to debate). But the alarming thing to me is that he has NEVER coached an offensively-talented team. In Montreal he had the likes of Recchi, Damphousse, Rucinsky, Koivu, Corson, Zubrus, Linden (snicker), Savage, etc at his disposal and couldn&#8217;t use them effectively. He&#8217;s had even less to work with in Vancouver honestly; assuming Gillis solves that, we&#8217;ll still back at square one wondering how long it&#8217;ll take him to employ his old tactics. Maybe he&#8217;ll adapt, maybe he won&#8217;t. If this team goes 5-20 out of the gate, sadly it wouldn&#8217;t be shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nebcanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeecanuck.com/2008/05/the-jack-adams-is-not-a-crutch/comment-page-1/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>nebcanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeecanuck.com/?p=372#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>The painful truth is, we haven&#039;t seen much of a change of player personnel yet, so we&#039;re not really able to predict with any accuracy whether Vignault will have the pieces to COACH at both ends of the ice.

Once the signing frenzy begins, we&#039;ll see if Gillis is willing to give him some offensive pieces. Until then, we have little choice but to assume that Vancouver&#039;s scoring failure is as much of not more due to the inept talent as opposed to the coaching.

I&#039;d like to see Vignault coach the team to success. But I also would love to see him get canned, if he deserves it. It&#039;s really a matter of the GM more than anything at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The painful truth is, we haven&#8217;t seen much of a change of player personnel yet, so we&#8217;re not really able to predict with any accuracy whether Vignault will have the pieces to COACH at both ends of the ice.</p>
<p>Once the signing frenzy begins, we&#8217;ll see if Gillis is willing to give him some offensive pieces. Until then, we have little choice but to assume that Vancouver&#8217;s scoring failure is as much of not more due to the inept talent as opposed to the coaching.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see Vignault coach the team to success. But I also would love to see him get canned, if he deserves it. It&#8217;s really a matter of the GM more than anything at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GZ Expat</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeecanuck.com/2008/05/the-jack-adams-is-not-a-crutch/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>GZ Expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeecanuck.com/?p=372#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>And, that is a formula for more boring hockey in the year to come...no matter who is in the lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, that is a formula for more boring hockey in the year to come&#8230;no matter who is in the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
