Comments on: The Jack Adams Is Not A Crutch

By: Kerrie Witvoet

Kerrie Witvoet — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:29:02 +0000

Fairly portion of contentI merely came across your website as well as within accession funds in order to declare that We obtain really loved accounts your

By: Clover

Clover — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:44:17 +0000

fin I loathe wikipedia

By: Paypal a Pesos

Paypal a Pesos — Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:39:03 +0000

Terrific post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Bless you!

By: Rachal Bohn

Rachal Bohn — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:49:02 +0000

Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this info. Today bloggers publish only about gossip and net stuff and this is actually irritating. A good site with exciting content, that is what I need. Thank you for making this website, and I’ll be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Cant find it.

By: seinfeld merchandise

seinfeld merchandise — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:03:42 +0000

I was searching on yahoo for this blog and I am thankful I found it again. I originally found it on twitter posted by radjane, she really likes the stories on this blog

By: twilight shop

twilight shop — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:55:38 +0000

I am trying to figure out how to bookmark this page I want to be able to come back to this site and read this post whenever I want. How do I bookmark it in safari?

By: Merlene Chargois

Merlene Chargois — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:16:13 +0000

Good Morning
finaly I found what I was looking for

how did you guys found this information??thank you for your post I found it on Yahoo And I saved it .I like. Please send me updates

thank you and have a nice day

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 25 May 2008 13:22:32 +0000

GZ Expat – I could take boring hockey (again) if it brought results. But that window has passed. 29 teams know how to shut down Vancouver (re: Vigneault’s) system now. He has to learn to evolve his strategy or it’ll be boring hockey on top of losing hockey.

Nebcanuck – I think it’s safe to assume that Gillis will bring in offensive talent (how “talented” they will be is of course up to debate). But the alarming thing to me is that he has NEVER coached an offensively-talented team. In Montreal he had the likes of Recchi, Damphousse, Rucinsky, Koivu, Corson, Zubrus, Linden (snicker), Savage, etc at his disposal and couldn’t use them effectively. He’s had even less to work with in Vancouver honestly; assuming Gillis solves that, we’ll still back at square one wondering how long it’ll take him to employ his old tactics. Maybe he’ll adapt, maybe he won’t. If this team goes 5-20 out of the gate, sadly it wouldn’t be shocking.

By: nebcanuck

nebcanuck — Sat, 24 May 2008 22:32:01 +0000

The painful truth is, we haven’t seen much of a change of player personnel yet, so we’re not really able to predict with any accuracy whether Vignault will have the pieces to COACH at both ends of the ice.

Once the signing frenzy begins, we’ll see if Gillis is willing to give him some offensive pieces. Until then, we have little choice but to assume that Vancouver’s scoring failure is as much of not more due to the inept talent as opposed to the coaching.

I’d like to see Vignault coach the team to success. But I also would love to see him get canned, if he deserves it. It’s really a matter of the GM more than anything at this point.

By: GZ Expat

GZ Expat — Sat, 24 May 2008 15:10:33 +0000

And, that is a formula for more boring hockey in the year to come…no matter who is in the lineup.